
Upcoming update of the carbon data basis
We are moving our food calculations to open UVEK/BAFU life-cycle inventories with revised process models, together with the reference unit and the rating benchmark. Values and rating thresholds change together on one announced date. What to expect, and how to plan.
Upcoming update of the carbon data basis
What is coming. The new data basis can pave the way to a European standard for the carbon labelling of food: we are moving all our calculations onto it. We are among the first providers of climate ratings for food to have made their calculation system public, and since the end of August the new data basis is published as well. Your values will thus, for the first time, rest on data and models that anyone can inspect and recompute. Together with the data basis, the reference unit (Daily Food Unit, 2026 definition) and the rating benchmark are being updated, and results are reported under the EF 3.1 climate-change method (IPCC AR6 GWP100 factors, with fossil, biogenic and land-use components).
What is behind it. We are moving the foundations of our food calculations to the open UVEK/BAFU life-cycle inventories, combined with revised process models for agriculture, feeding and processing. This is more than swapping the background data: we revised the process layer in between — more than 70 publicly documented building blocks for transport, fertilisers, packaging, land use and the individual product groups, process-based emission models for agriculture instead of adopted averages, a confidence on every emission flow, and a quality system with regression tests.
When. Values and rating thresholds switch together on the date of the switch. We announce that date to every customer in good time beforehand and publish the detailed change record for the released data version at the switch. Until then, values and rating thresholds stay on the current basis; a sample output with old and new values is available on request.
What you can expect. Because the models become more specific, CO₂ values and ratings can change even where recipes stay the same. From our comparison runs on real menus:
| Food group | Direction | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Beef, cream and butter, hard cheese | up | Herd model counts enteric methane and manure explicitly, where one average figure was applied before; milk intake per kilogram of cheese corrected |
| Rice | up | Anchored on measured paddy-rice cultivation instead of a global market average; paddy methane, counted before and now, varies about fourfold by growing region and the new anchor sits at the higher end |
| Pork, veal | down | Built up from actual feed and rearing systems instead of a flat average figure |
| Coffee | down | Land-use change at the farm stage on published research |
| Fruit and vegetables, sauces | slightly down on balance | Many small re-anchorings on updated European reference data |
| Chicken, fish | mixed by origin | Country-specific models; individual products can move either way |
These are directions from the migration analysis of August 2026 (data version 1.7.0); the final figures come with the release. The rating thresholds move with the values, so most dishes keep their rating; a dish moves only where its ingredients genuinely stand out against the new, more accurate assessment. Final figures per product family, with before and after values, are published with the release.
A change in the calculation is not a change in emissions. A lower value after the switch describes the updated assessment basis. Real reductions are judged on comparable calculation versions.
The inventory detail per product family, with before and after values per assessed product, is in our website changelog. More: open data and model documentation · benchmark derivation (provisional). A data release records a data version; the independent assessment of the rating system is a separate step, and its status is published on the same portal.
Ready to Transform Your Food Impact?
Discover how Eaternity can help your organization achieve sustainability goals.
Get Started